How to identify real challenges facing your business?

26/08/2022 Argaam

How do you know if you have identified the real challenge facing your business? And, once you identify that challenge, how do you know that you are solving it correctly? Answering both those questions requires not only a willingness to innovate but also the humility to change direction.

 

This is the salutary lesson to be drawn from the past. It can help executives and leaders today understand the need to question their strategies and better evaluate their chances of success.

 

 

Panama Canal

 

When Theodore Roosevelt undertook to build the Panama Canal in 1903, he thought the problem was all about digging.

 

In the 1880s, the French had come to Central America with plans to replicate their success completing the Suez Canal. Finished in 1865, it took ten years to build.

 

But the Panama Canal proved a more formidable challenge, and, after eight years of digging, the French left defeated.

 

The US took over, believing that it was just a matter of using more efficient and more powerful diggers.

 

Like the French, the US was trying to build a sea-level canal, which meant digging a 50-mile trench across Panama and letting it be filled by the Pacific and Atlantic oceans.

 

This approach worked fine for the Suez Canal, but Panama wasn’t Egypt. The country is mountainous and covered with swamps, jungles, and rainforests, not desert.

 

By mid-1905, 60% to 75% of the project’s US staff had left, resigned, or died from yellow fever.

 

At the rate they were going, completing the dig of a sea-level canal would have taken an estimated 27 years.

 

Roosevelt was a quick learner, and not shy about admitting he’d made a mistake. He realized he had to solve two fundamental problems simultaneously: dirt and disease.

 

To tackle the former, Roosevelt appointed John Stevens, the architect behind the Great Northern Railway, as chief engineer after Wallace resigned.

 

To tackle the latter problem, Roosevelt agreed to fund a US$1 million health initiative to eradicate mosquitos to eliminate yellow fever.

 

Stevens concentrated on solving a vexing engineering conundrum. It wasn’t a matter of making the dirt fly, but rather what to do with the spoil: the earth that was dug out. If workers could cart the dirt away more efficiently, work on the canal would speed up.

 

Stevens approached this challenge by deciding to dig at both ends simultaneously.

 

By laying enough parallel train track along the length of the cut through the mountains—a method he had devised to remove dirt for the railroad—Stevens could send train carriages up the cut empty and down the other side of the cut full.

 

Although this maximized efficiency, it also revealed another problem: no amount of engineering could overcome the sheer volume of earth that needed to be removed to dig a sea-level canal. A mountain is very different from a desert.

 

The only way to build the Panama Canal was to build a lock-based waterway, one in which ships would move up and down vertically as they traveled along the canal in order to account for changes in elevation.

 

This single decision changed the course of maritime and world history. The canal opened in 1914, just short of ten years after the US effort began.

 

Other Examples

 

There are many famous cases of business executives striving for a result only to realize too late that the real problem they needed to solve was not the obvious one.

 

Kodak continuing to focus on film cameras rather than digital in the 1980s.

 

Blockbuster investing in brick-and-mortar outlets to expand its market reach while failing to see that Netflix would make stores obsolete.

 

Blackberry was keen to improve its phone’s keyboard when the world was moving toward short text messages tapped out on a touchscreen.

 

Lessons

 

Workforce strategies need to avoid similar traps.

 

With companies facing the “great resignation,” leaders should be wary of solutions to the wrong problems—for example, simply offering more money.

 

Financial reward, these days, is not always the determining factor that encourages employees to stay or go elsewhere.

 

PwC’s 2022 Global Workforce Hopes and Fears Survey of 52,000 people worldwide found that job fulfilment and the ability to be your true self at work are in many cases just as important as pay.

 

Rich Blumberg, president of World Sales Solutions, which helps companies implement collaborative working platforms, described to me a change he made in his firm to improve employee morale.

 

That had nothing to do with pay or perks: an optional morning call devoted exclusively to discussing the fun things people did over the weekend.

 

“It was a simple, low-key process that bonded the team members,” Blumberg said, “and was a more entertaining way to start the week than focusing on key targets for the week, month, or quarter ahead, which could be handled in calls later in the day.”

 

Source: Strategy + Business

Comments {{getCommentCount()}}

Be the first to comment

loader Train
Sorry: the validity period has ended to comment on this news
Opinions expressed in the comments section do not reflect the views of Argaam. Abusive comments of any kind will be removed. Political or religious commentary will not be tolerated.